电影讲述了一名坐在轮椅上的女歌手与她的好朋友的一趟前往孟菲斯的公路之旅。
一個看似幸福和樂的中產家庭,卻因19個月大的兒子乃是經由人工受孕所生,逐漸出現裂痕。究竟捐精者是誰?捐精者是否與女主人有染?而捐精者自己的家庭會否受到影響?這部解構當代核心家庭本質的傑作與質疑婚姻立場的《情炎》不僅在同一年推出,同樣由岡田茉莉子和木村功領銜主演,中心思想上更是遙相呼應,吉田喜重揚棄《秋津溫泉》藉由通俗敘事深入角色內在層次的方式,轉而以更跳躍的敘事及更風格化的場面調度,展現個人內在情慾煎熬。
女排猎鹰队的小面包车抛锚后,她们困在了前不着村、后不着店的地方。殊不知落到了原始猎人的领地,而且追捕即刻开始。漫漫长夜就此展开,这一晚她们疲于奔命,团队精神也经受着考验。但是,女孩们远比看起来更加足智多谋。在森林中心,翻盘在即……
Deserves recognition as an interesting misunderstanding of the hallucination generation, 20 January 2007 Author: TimothyFarrell from Worcester, MA "Wild in the Streets" comes from the same school of film making that spawned other attempts to connect to the counterculture such as "Skidoo" and "Candy". The difference between this and the aforementioned films is that "Wild in the Streets" is reasonably clever and well-made. It isn't sympathetic to the counterculture and will likely offend those with fond memories of the time. Surprisingly, it was a big hit when released and appealed to the youth whom it ridiculed so much. Unlike "The Trip" and "Psych-Out" (two other AIP films), its not an accurate representation of the movement at all. However it does work as social satire. The direction by Barry Shear is good and makes innovative use of split screen photography. Plus, he keeps everything moving at a quick pace. In its funny moments, the film works well. In its attempts at drama, its helplessly dated and just as funny as the humorous moments. Christopher Jones underplays his role and Shelly Winters overacts. Hal Holbrook offers the best performance and Diane Varsi achieves the right note of "grooviness". The script by Robert Thom has its moments, especially the ending (easily the most ingenious part of the film). "Wild in the Streets" isn't perfect, but deserves recognition as an interesting misunderstanding of the hallucination generation. Those into this kind of kitsch will enjoy it the most. I'd rather watch "The Trip" or "Psych-Out" however. (6/10) -from imdb