特伦鲍姆一家

　　丹尼斯（安德鲁·加菲尔德 Andrew Garfield 饰）独自一人抚养着儿子康纳（诺亚·洛马克斯 Noah Lomax 饰），父子两人和丹尼斯的母亲林恩（劳拉·邓恩 Laura Dern 饰）住在一起，日子过得虽然拮据但是平静。
　　金融危机爆发后，丹尼斯的人生彻底的跌入了低谷。面对着他再怎样努力都无法负担的房贷，无奈的丹尼斯只得申请破产，一家人被赶出了他们的家，流落街头，生活陷入了绝望之中。为了夺回属于他们的家园，丹尼斯发誓要不择一切手段，他遇见了贪婪邪恶的房地产经纪人瑞克（迈克尔·珊农 Michael Shannon 饰），成为了他的爪牙，讽刺的是，当初，正是瑞克让丹尼斯失去了他的家园，而如今丹尼斯所要干的，无非是和瑞克一样的事情。

　　影片由奥斯卡·罗勒根据由他自己创作的小说《出身》改编成电影。故事的时间跨度从二战结束后的1949年一直延续到80年代，讲述了联邦德国一个家庭祖孙三代人的故事。罗伯特·弗赖塔格(雷纳德·施莱舍)的祖父埃里希(约根·沃格尔)，一个战俘，在逃亡中将自己的妻子托付给另一个女人。罗伯特的父母，作家诺拉和罗尔夫，因一场桃色事件而相互折磨，并为了追求自我实现和自由恋爱而走向毁灭。罗伯特自己，在祖父母充满安全感的家庭和68年代被压抑的生活间成长，一直在艰难地寻找属于自己的幸福。by:yakubd.cc

　　未来，地球环境变得愈来愈恶劣，人类纷纷踏上外太空移民的星际之路。一艘硕大的航天飞船遭遇空难毁灭，载着船长的逃生舱被另一艘飞船所营救。然而，逃生舱里只有被划定为非公民的夏娃·米勒中尉（玛丽娜·赛提斯 Marina Sirtis 饰），此时她呆呆傻傻，陷入混沌。船长命令部下提取她的记忆，从记忆中得知，已经怀孕的米勒中尉在灾难中和富兰克林船长、多默、汤姆森、李等共计五人登上了逃生舱。虽然米勒遭受其他人的歧视和羞辱，但她还是竭尽全力要寻找生还的希望。只不过最后舱里究竟发生了什么事？其他四人究竟去了哪里？
　　米勒中尉的记忆中藏着可怕的未解之谜……

　　本片是受奥地利剧作家亚瑟·施尼茨勒的《轮舞》的启发，导演费尔南多·梅里尔斯和编剧将原著中摩登又不停变化的螺旋叙事整合成一个故事，通过剧中人物串联起来：他们来自不同的国家和城市，共同讲述在21世纪生动，充满悬念又感人至深的爱情传说。故事起自维也纳，影片美妙的将巴黎，伦敦，布拉迪斯拉发，里约，丹佛和菲尼克斯，不同城市的人们编织出一幅简单却又令人如痴如醉的叙述。

　　玛侬（艾曼纽·贝阿 Emmanuelle Béart 饰）是一个游荡于山林之中的牧羊女，在她温婉美丽的外表下，隐藏了一段悲惨的往事。玛侬的父亲死于一场阴谋，而罪魁祸首正是帕比特（伊夫·蒙当 Yves Montand 饰）和格林特（丹尼尔·奥图 Daniel Auteuil 饰）叔侄二人。
　　一次偶然中，格林特看见了正在沐浴的玛侬，不知真相的他深深的为玛侬的美貌而着迷，但此时，玛侬早已和教师贝莱德（西波里特·吉拉多特 Hippolyte Girardot 饰）两情相悦了。玛侬逐渐得知了父亲死亡的真相，愤怒的她将仇恨埋藏在心底，期望着雪耻的一天到来。在玛侬的设计下，她在所有村民面前解开了帕比特和格林特伪善的面具，格林特羞愧而死。但是，悲剧并没有就此结束。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　Sara has some questions. Engaged for one day, she decides to call off her marriage. Quirky and beautiful, she is working on being bold. Having had a short relationship with a woman in college, Sara seeks that feeling again. How can she have a woman's touch without giving up men entirely? This question launches Sara on a bittersweet journey filled with self discovery, sexual awakening, beautiful women and sometimes men.