失踪女孩

　　The summer of 1939, France and Provence, 14 year old boy Julian is infatuated with her cousin Julia, Julia and his family lived in a sm all hotel, unfortunately, she ignored him, because she is the cousin in several years. The guests of the hotel Charles, a shameful 20 year-old young people, regardless of their own was engaged at this girl, joined the competition game...

　　プロローグ
　　一人暮らしをする主人公（谷村）はある日、自宅の異変を感じる。上がっているはずのない便座が上がっていたり、触れていないはずの歯ブラシが濡れていたり…。怖くなった主人公は友人（浅野）に泊まりに来てもらうのだが…。
　　第一話「計画された別れの演出と戦慄」
　　長く同棲していた交際相手（松岡）に別れを告げたばかりの主人公（弓削）。すぐに彼女が別れを受け入れて荷物をまとめて出て行こうとする。すると彼女が「明日誕生日でしょ？」とパソコンをくれた。断りきれずに受け取った主人公だが…。
　　第二話「日常に潜む不条理の確率」
　　女子高生の主人公（足立）は友人との約束の為、学校帰りにコインロッカーに寄って私服に着替えることに。制服を入れる為にコインロッカーを開けると、中には同じコインロッカーの19番の鍵が。面白半分で19番の鍵を開けると、そこには500万円の小切手と30番の鍵が。驚いた主人公だったが、興味本位で30番を開けるとそこには…。
　　第三話「保身に必要な最低限の代償」
　　会社員の主人公（石堂）は苛立っていた。部下（野嵜）に頼んでいた大事な報告書が完成していなかったからだ。普段からミスの多いこの部下に対してきつく当たる主人公。「20時までには終わらせます！終わらなかったら髪の毛を切ります！」と宣言する部下に呆れ半分で仕事を任せる。結果、報告書は書き直し。部下がそれをシュレッダーにかけていると、その中に主人公が大切にしている大ファンのアーティストとのツーショット写真がある事に気づかず、一緒にシュレッダーにかけてしまい…。
　　第四話「持たざる者の恐怖と狂気」
　　タクシー運転手の主人公（辻）は田町までの客（地曵）を乗せる。しかしこの客、電話中にシートベルト着用を頼むと嫌そうな顔をする、常に命令口調など、かなり乗車マナーが悪い。主人公は客のその態度への苛立ちから、自分が今日でリストラで最後の運転である事を明かし…。
　　第五話「天使の中にある恐るべき残酷」
　　母親（阿部）に遊園地に連れて行ってもらった主人公（佐藤）。母親のビデオ撮影の下で楽しんでいると、その遊園地のメインキャラクターであるクマの着ぐるみに風船をもらいに行く。喜ぶ主人公だったが、目の前で別の子供達（伊集院・富永）がクマに乱暴し始めた。段々冗談じゃ済まされないレベルになって行き、遂には着ぐるみの頭を外そうとする。たまらず母親はカメラを背けて主人公を呼ぶと、いつの間にかクマと子供達がいなくなっていた。すると主人公がすぐに「あっ、クマさんだ！」とクマを見つけ、再び駆け寄るのだが…。
　　第六話「無欲で得た悲劇の主人公の座」
　　ネットサーフィンをしていた主人公（平方）は「人を殺してしまいました」というタイトルのスレッドを見つける。内容は「死体の処理の仕方に困ってます」。主人公は冗談で「出来るだけ細かく裁断すれば？」と書き込む。すると翌日、「裁断しました。その後は？」と返信が来ている。再び「生ゴミの日に一個一個出せば？」と書き込む。その書き込みが続くうち、「冗談にしても不快だ」「お前も逝ってよし」とスレッドが荒れる。「そりゃそうか…」と呟く主人公がカーソルを下げると、「信じてもらえないので、以下の場所に証拠品を黒いバックに入れておきます」。そこは自分の家のすぐ近くだった。何故か気になった主人公はその場所に赴く。そこには本当に黒いバックが置いてあったのだが…。
　　エピローグ
　　主人公（谷村）は自宅に何者かが不法侵入していると確信、家庭用の監視カメラを設置する。その晩、パソコンでカメラの画像を見るが、誰も何も映っていない。「気のせいか…」。呟きながら映像をスクロールしていると、遂にカメラが侵入者を捕えた。やりたい放題の侵入者の映像を見ていると…。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

　　布鲁诺（杰瑞米•雷尼尔 饰）是一名20岁的街头混混，过活的营生是各种合法、非法的地下交易，他的女友，18岁的索尼亚（黛博拉•弗朗西斯 饰）也没正当的工作，平日靠微薄的救济津贴和他度日。
　　索尼亚怀孕期间，依靠钻政府政策的空子过了一段不错的日子，但在生下孩子后，生活又陷捉襟见肘境地 ，好在，布鲁诺看起来也很开心他们的生活中多出一个小生命。但索尼亚不知的是，布鲁诺的高兴劲只是佯装，他在伺机把婴儿卖掉换得一笔收入，因为他认为自己根本没能力担负起父亲的责任。

　　This 1992 Japanese film tells the story of a scientist who sets out to create the new "super Adam and Eve", humans who cannot be controlled by their emotions. Of course, the end result it not exactly what the good doctor expects.
　　comments from imdb:
　　This modern tale of an attempt to build a creature is one of the best "horror" films ever made, even if its not a horror film but something else entirely. Certainly its on my short list of all time great films.
　　This film was introduced to me by someone who told me "I have this film that probably one of the best films you'll ever see. It will move you and touch you and make you think, but if I told you what it is and told you how its done you will think its the stupidest thing on the face of it and you won't watch it." Intrigued I asked what did he mean, and he said, "Well its a Frankenstein story, with a very goofy sort of edge, but which uses it to its advantage." My ears perked up, and I being a trusting soul took the tape and watched it. I was blown away.
　　The plot concerns a mad scientist attempting to make a new Adam and Eve in the wake of a suicidal plague that is ravaging the world. Locked up in his lab his experiments go differently then either he or we expect. Some of it is silly (The bolts in the neck, the wrestling moves...), all of it is touching and thought provoking.
　　I can not recommend this movie enough. If you are willing to take the film on its terms and allow it to tell its story then I urge you to seek this film out and see it. This is an undiscovered gem that will stay with you forever.
　　15 out of 10 and then some. 10/10
　　Also known as "The Last Frankenstein", this is an extraordinary, impeccably produced horror film. Director Takeshi Kawamura uses Mary Shelley's novel as a mere launching pad for an exploration of subjects as diverse and fascinating as the nature of love, desire, suicide, mass hypnosis, sex, alienation and jealousy.
　　And though the film is dense with subtext, it is also stunningly photographed and rich in atmosphere and detail. The performances are all amazing and Kawamura's sensitive handling of the strange, delicate relationships between the characters results in an emotionally charged, angst-ridden tragedy.
　　The scenes of the confused, troubled monster hurtling through a fog-shrouded forest at night are memorable and striking, as is a brilliant home movie-style montage of the film's more curious characters enjoying a precious afternoon at the beach. Kawamura creates resonating visual poetry of horror and sadness barely sighted since Todd Browning's classic "Freaks".
　　Intelligent, emotional, tragic and real, this is an absolute gem. 9/10

　　影片主要讲述了长安城内，曲江池中突发水怪食人事件，大理寺卿薛杨（李岩 饰）与仵作上官羽（徐冬冬 饰）奉命查清命案真相。两人调查过程中发现，在曲江池底有大量散落的骷髅与人骨，其中更隐藏着一个关乎朝堂稳定的惊天阴谋。
　　无名尸体惨死江中，长安城内，鱼妖作怪的谣言四起，数名小乞丐接连离奇失踪，更使案件疑点重重。鱼怪是妖人巫岩沱（尹子维 饰）蓄意豢养？太子（马率 饰）在曲江池上祭母，会惨遭鱼怪与杀手双重围攻？神秘女剑客（彭静 饰）为何冒死追杀巫岩沱？御史中丞郭长之（刘风刚 饰）与兵部尚书沈术（杨永文 饰）孰忠孰奸？惊险案中案环环相扣，谜团揭露迫在眉睫。

　　故事讲述一位母亲（格伦·克洛斯 Glenn Close 饰）帮助女儿莫莉（米拉·库尼斯 Mila Kunis饰）度过从药物滥用中康复的关键四天。长期疏远之后，她们在一起的时光不仅抚平了彼此造成的痛苦创伤，也重燃了他们对彼此最根本的、复杂的爱。
　　本片根据普利策奖得主伊莱·萨斯洛的WaPo文章改编，加西亚将与其共同撰写剧本。