老夫子2001

　　14岁的格蕾丝是个任性的姑娘，她决定离家出走，于是她的父母开始一段追寻之路，穿越整个西澳大利亚。在一位退休侦探的帮助下，夫妻两人很快意识到是时候现实了，也该面对两人的关系变化。

　　小提琴家刘智康（金城武）和翻译家蔡嘉仪（梁咏琪）的房间仅相隔一堵墙，然而由于总是在同一时刻同一地点一个向左一个向右走，他们从没遇见过。某天因为来到同一所公园，他们终于在一片水池的一端相遇，并且一见如故。一个快乐又甜蜜的下午很快过去，快黄昏时突降倾盆大雨，两人于匆忙分手时交换了电话号码，不料到家后发现写有号码的纸片已被雨水打湿成模糊一团。
　　为了让刘智康和蔡嘉仪今生都不能再见面，分别暗恋他们的小红和胡医生想出诡计，加上两人相遇的公园正在清拆，他们开始相信彼此之间真的没有缘分。

　　该片讲述了IF公司的研究基地在研发期间突然集体失联，项目负责人刘超带领科考小队深入地底矿脉进行调查，项目组田教授之子田力为寻找同样失联的女儿妞妞加入小队，一行人深入实验室发现项目组创造的改造蜂失控并袭击了实验室所有人，而营救妞妞的田力与队员也遭遇了一场惊心动魄的惊险之旅。

　　Special Agent Alexander Connor is sent to investigate a house, from which a woman named Sandra has made numerous 911 calls. Things become more complicated than expected for Agent Connor, as he finds he must also rescue a police officer who responded to the home 24 hours earlier. Soon, Agent Connor will discover a horrifying secret; that Sandra is one of LUMEN CORPORATION's donors and has devoted her house to the corporation; a house which has been turned into a research lab for atrocious experiments performed on human beings.

　　本片改编自日本推理小说家江户川乱步1928年的同名小说。法国教授阿历克斯·法约尔（伯努瓦·马吉梅 Benoît Magimel 饰）是研究神秘的日本黑暗侦探小说家平田一郎的专家。阿历克斯自己的侦探小说在日本出版后取得了巨大成功，受邀来到京都参加宣传活动，他告诉出版社的本田（岛冈现 Gen Shimaoka 饰）他非常想拜见平田一郎，但几番努力均不得法。在一次晚宴中，阿历克斯认识了京都知名艺伎玉子（源利华 Lika Minamoto 饰），不禁陷入情网。玉子告诉阿历克斯自己的旧情人正是平田一郎。为情所动的阿历克斯全力帮助玉子排除危难，却没想到自己正陷入一场出人意外的阴谋……
　　本片被提名2008年威尼斯电影节金狮奖。

　　宁静的小城，纯真的岁月，全城高考的紧张气氛凝聚的高中，由一场大胆的表白掀起了全校传递情书的风潮，一封知名不具的仰慕信展开了一个故事……

　　挪威是个拥有大量公路隧道的国家，但是由于隧道建设时缺少应急规划和救灾避难设施，隧道内的火灾往往是致命的。
　　斯坦好不容易在圣诞节前一天请了假，打算与女儿和女伴一起渡个假，但伊莉斯却因为满心都是去世的母亲，跟斯坦大吵一架，坐上了去奥斯陆的长途大巴。可就在伊莉斯坐的大巴驶入隧道后不久，大巴前面行驶的油罐车出事故导致隧道里的交通都堵塞住了，恶劣的天气让所有救援都不能及时赶到。而后油罐车还短路爆炸了，滚烫的浓烟瞬间填满了隧道。伊莉斯带着大家自救，到隧道里的检修小屋里避难。斯坦开车冲进了浓烟去寻找自己的女儿。隧道里遍布大量窒息的死者，伊莉斯他们避难的小屋里也逐渐被烟雾填满，终于，斯坦出现并救了伊莉斯和几位幸存者。返程路上，救援中心通知斯坦有两位小女孩就困在他们附近，斯坦让女儿和幸存者先走，自己独自去寻找两个姑娘。小姑娘找到了，但把所有呼吸装备都给了别人的斯坦却撑不住失去了意识，恍惚中他发现女儿伊莉斯回来了，她帮斯坦通知了队友和女伴，所有人一起从浓烟和塌方中救出了快要窒息的斯坦。
　　最终，虽然这场事故造成了极大的伤亡，但在救援队员拼死的行动下，还是挽救了一些宝贵的生命，而斯坦新组建的家庭也因这次生死经历而凝聚在了一起。

　　Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
　　The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
　　From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.